I first ran my model with an inverse linear relationship between accretion and elevation (low = 2 mm/year, high = 6 mm/year) in a region that was "freshwater influenced". All categories without the empirical relationship were assigned accretion of 3 mm/year.
Then I ran the same model, but with 2x the accretion rates and found no difference between the model outputs within the region of freshwater influence. There were differences outside the freshwater region.
To confirm, I ran the low/high accretion scenarios without freshwater influence and saw a major difference.
Am I implementing the freshwater influence module incorrectly? Or is it just a bug since this option is still relatively new in SLAMM?