Hello,

In our recent model run the SLAMM outputs for Estuarine and Riverine Tidal  polygons are showing no deviation from existing conditions under a A1B max at 2100 and 2175. Shouldn't  these boundaries be moving inland? What appears to be modeled are grey striations (multiple lines) within the Riverine Tidal polygon, more so at 2100. Is this a glitch in the model?

Will the model run if a negative value ( such as -1)  is entered into the Historical trend parameter? I am wondering if the model can work backwards to reflect shifts in wetland structure due receding water levels from  a highly  emergent coastline. Thanks

Is it possible to use  a fixed SLR value,  for example 2.5 meters , and determine when it would be reached under each of the scenarios?

Are there any caveats to modeling beyond the year 2100?

Hello,

I have recently located some local uplift data showing a range   of .1 to 1.0 mm/year here in Klamath CA. I do not have a layer representing this value and I am wondering how I can use the historical Trend Parameter to increase the accuracy of the model?  Would you recommend that I use an average, .5 mm/year, in the Historical trend box?