Mary-- thanks so much for the follow-up. We have been chasing deadlines here in Vermont so I just had a chance to come in today to answer and was happy to see that it had been resolved.
One of the tests that we performed for SLAMM 6.7 was to reproduce results from previous versions after a fairly major rewrite to the core procedures (to allow categories to be flexible and add a new California category set). While there may still be some glitches, I am hopeful that the new version is fairly stable at this point. The code re-write should allow us to bring the capability to edit category types and the "succession flow chart" in the near future.
Please let us know if you have further questions and my apologies about the delay in responding.
One of the tests that we performed for SLAMM 6.7 was to reproduce results from previous versions after a fairly major rewrite to the core procedures (to allow categories to be flexible and add a new California category set). While there may still be some glitches, I am hopeful that the new version is fairly stable at this point. The code re-write should allow us to bring the capability to edit category types and the "succession flow chart" in the near future.
Please let us know if you have further questions and my apologies about the delay in responding.